 |
| Photo credit - View of Paris from the Institut du Monde Arabe, Jan Wyers |
When the masked thugs of ISIS swing their sledgehammers through Iraq’s museums and dynamite Palmyra, the world gasps and screams. But what if the vandal is a chic Parisian woman wearing high-heeled boots and talking like a visionary? What if her target is the world’s most beloved and most-visited city? Does the world gasp, or does it not even hear what she is saying? “We’ll always have Paris,” Rick tells Elsa in “Casablanca.” Yet now, Mayor Anne Hidalgo says she will “reinvent” Paris. Without putting it to a vote, she will replace the uniquely harmonious city we know with something “modern” and “contemporary.” She will pierce the low horizon with a dozen skyscrapers, replace classic stone facades with rivers of glass, and bury the famous zinc and slate rooftops under new construction. Mon Dieu! Doesn’t anyone get what Paris is doing to itself?
Wake up, world! Mayor Hidalgo will march through Paris like Sherman through Georgia. Cooing soothing words from the lexicon of global capital, she will dot that low skyline with bleeding-edge skyscrapers in bizarre shapes, one a triangle, one a stack of glass boxes, one shaped into two leaning towers. That’s “reinventing.” Right now, Paris is a city of stone. Mayor Hidalgo will add the same concrete-glass-steel texture that has made so many cities worldwide into banal clones. That’s “reinventing.”
Is the world really so
narcotized, so mesmerized, by the words “modern” and “contemporary,” so
intimidated by the stars of international architecture and commerce, so
distracted by the mayor’s elegant appearance, that it can value Palmyra and
forget Paris?
And can anyone really believe
the mayor’s claims? Can any solar-panel magic make these glass structures
sustainable? Will corporate behemoths really flock to Paris once another
skyscraper, like the much-despised Tour Montparnasse, looms over the city’s six-
and eight-story buildings?
As U.S. liaison for SOS
Paris, the French preservationist group, and as founder of the International
Coalition for the Preservation of Paris, ICPP, I know this battle is just a
skirmish in a larger war for Paris. We honor humanity’s delight in the
uniqueness of beloved cities, Paris among them. Out-spent and out-publicized,
fragilely-funded Davids, we fight for urban traditions that reach through the
long and tumultuous history of Paris, defending against globalized, standardized,
architecture.
The Goliaths in this drama
are the deep-pocketed international corporations, star architects, and
politicians at City Hall. They are the city’s free-spending promoters, pushing
for a glitzier Paris. They call it a more “innovative” Paris. But that turns
out to be a Paris that looks like New York, Tokyo, and all the other corporate
capitals.
The mayor scored a big win in
2016, when the highest administrative appeals court in France allowed City Hall
to depart from the planning code and issue a building permit that ruptures the
beauty of historic central Paris. Giant luxury-goods purveyor LVMH, the court
said, could plunk—if you can believe it—an enormous undulating glass wall on
the back of its Samaritaine complex, among the rows of classic stone facades on
a quintessentially Parisian street, the rue de Rivoli. Seven stories tall,
without doors or windows, and at 265 feet nearly as long as a football field,
it looms up like a spaceship in central Paris.
 |
| Photo credit - Luxembourg architect Colum Mulhern |
The appeals court stressed
that this alien structure is “contemporary.” But as the lower court said, in
this context, it is “dissonant.” Put it in a shopping mall near a highway, and
it may be beautiful. In central Paris, the ideal of urbanity, that facade is
the rowdy drunk who crashes the party. Now the rue de Rivoli will lose its
glamour by a thousand cuts, one facade screaming louder than the next.
Developers argue that without
such intrusions, Paris will become a museum, like Venice. In fact, Paris is one
of the liveliest cities on earth. Can a glass facade disrupting the rue de
Rivoli make Paris livelier? Attract international corporations? Show me how! We
preservationists do not oppose development. And Olivier de Monicault, the
president d'honneur of SOS Paris, freely agrees that since we must continue to
build inside Paris, “demolitions are unavoidable.” We want Paris to be vital
and alive, to grow. In harmony with its traditions.
City Hall has traded French
elegance for globalized disruptiveness. Let the world cry out as loudly for
Paris as for Palmyra! Support the people of Paris.
It is heartbreaking to think
what may be lost.
Contributed by Mary Campbell Gallagher
Bio: Mary Campbell Gallagher is founder and president of the International
Coalition for the Preservation of Paris, ICPP: SaveParis.org At the earliest
opportunity, ICPP will publish its book of 49 essays opposing skyscrapers in
Paris called Paris Without Skyscrapers/Paris sans gratte-ciel, of which
she is editor. Forewords are by Andres Duany, Jan Wyers, and Alexandre Gady.
Bibliographic details: "How to Destroy Paris,” Architecture Here and There,
9.19.16, https://architecturehereandthere.com/2016/09/19/paris-modern-architecture-hidalgo/.
Republished as: "Protecting Paris," The Wall Street Journal.com October
3, 2016. https://www.wsj.com/articles/protecting-paris-1475531652
Published in French as <<Comment Detruire Paris? Une façade de verre sur la rue de
Rivoli peut-elle rendre Paris plus vivant ?>> (trans. H. Hyman), Bulletin de SOS Paris. No.
98. Novembre-Decembre 2016, pp. 20-21 http://sosparis.free.fr/bu11tins/sosp98.pdf
